[REQ_ERR: 401] [KTrafficClient] Something is wrong. Enable debug mode to see the reason. ¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs?

¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs?

July 18, Read Previous Read Next. Top Content. How to Deal Cards with Style March 10, Read More. All You Need to Know About RTP in February 21, Read More. A guide. December 1, Read More. September 13, Read More. How to Use the Royal Match Side Bet September 12, Read More.

All About Live Quantum Blackjack Plus September 11, Read More. How Hand Signals Work at Blackjack Tables August 25, Read More. From Casino Royale to Casino Jack: Great Films March 20, Read More.

From Liberty Bell to Online: A Journey the March 19, Read More. Why Are People So Superstitious in Casinos? March 18, Read More.

How to Host the Perfect Casino-themed Party March 17, Read More. How to Understand the Roulette Wheel March 16, Read More. Five World Currencies That Are as Good as Read Previous Read Next. Top Content.

How to Deal Cards with Style March 10, Read More. All You Need to Know About RTP in February 21, Read More. A guide. December 1, Read More. September 13, Read More. How to Use the Royal Match Side Bet September 12, Read More. All About Live Quantum Blackjack Plus September 11, Read More.

How Hand Signals Work at Blackjack Tables August 25, Read More. From Liberty Bell to Online: A Journey the March 19, Read More. Why Are People So Superstitious in Casinos? March 18, Read More. How to Host the Perfect Casino-themed Party March 17, Read More.

How to Understand the Roulette Wheel March 16, Read More. Five World Currencies That Are as Good as March 15, Read More. Discover five of the best slot game providers March 14, Read More.

If there's a way to win it by counting, okay, fine, have at it. But if you don't count? Do not, under any circumstances, waste your money on 2) Play with CSMs only. 3) Play higher deck games (at least 6 decks) 3) Use Martingale betting (as example above) only once. (Do not I'm relatively new to blackjack and I'm currently memorizing basic strategy %. At my casino, they offer a perfect pair side bet with

Video

Blackjack - $200,000 Buy In - MASSIVE $500,000 WIN!! Insane $100,000 Bets With Very Lucky Hands!

¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs? - Two cards are dealt to each player and the dealer. The Perfect Pairs bet is settled. The main blackjack hand continues as normal. Perfect Pairs If there's a way to win it by counting, okay, fine, have at it. But if you don't count? Do not, under any circumstances, waste your money on 2) Play with CSMs only. 3) Play higher deck games (at least 6 decks) 3) Use Martingale betting (as example above) only once. (Do not I'm relatively new to blackjack and I'm currently memorizing basic strategy %. At my casino, they offer a perfect pair side bet with

This bet is like Perfect Pairs on steroids. As the name suggests, the Super Sevens side bet pays out when you or the dealer receive 7s in the first deal. Skip to content. Home Learn Blackjack The Perfect Pairs Blackjack Side Bet.

July 18, Read Previous Read Next. Top Content. How to Deal Cards with Style March 10, Read More. All You Need to Know About RTP in February 21, Read More. A guide. December 1, Read More. September 13, Read More. How to Use the Royal Match Side Bet September 12, Read More.

I believe this is a worth-trying strategy here in Queensland, but not sure about Sydney Star City or Melbourne Crown. If they only pay 25 to 1 for PP, the house edge will be higher. Also, it is better to play PP with CSMs, not shoe games, as the more cards are removed from the shoe, the lower chance you will catch a pair.

The more decks in the machine, the more edge you have in playing PP. So to sum it up: 1 Play PP when there is only one box. Stick to it. Get enough money ready to continue playing this way for at least 7 times consecutively on 7 separate days , and you will see the result if only 1 or 2 times, luck plays a major role.

I prefer the aggressive option, but you can make your own choice. I would like to see debate about this, but I will appreciate reasoning, not assertion. UK Well-Known Member Oct 10, We have PP in the UK - everywhere I have played has.

It's been discussed within the forum on occasions, although all of the APs here won't touch it due to it's high HE - around eleven times that of the main bet in a six deck shoe, and over twice that of the 37 notched wheel of fortune.

One of the theoretical questions has been, is there a point when counting cards that that the count will be so high, the probability of pulling a pair, matched coloured pair or perfect pair becomes such that the odds are in favour of making this side bet?

Also, with a greater chance of pulling a 20 or BJ, does that justify making a smaller side bet covered by the increased main bet made in line with the count?

I think the answer is yes, although the count would have to be so high the frequency of seeing it would be minute. There is the dichotomy that the edge on the side bet reduces as more decks are in play, but then the frequency of seeing the count that justifies making the bet reduces as well.

If you're playing PPs in a game serviced with a CSM, then there will be no high count as such, and so no increased edge in the main bet to offset the edge in the side bet. The continuous shuffling effect will, in theory, increase the possibilities of pairs popping out as cards are recycled though, and it would be interesting to see what a computer simulation throws up and if, and by how much, the edge on the side bet reduces.

I've read through your post twice and, correct me if I'm mistaken, it looks as if you are applying a progression system of sorts. If you accept that progressions have a nil effect on the HE you should, they do , then you'll continue to play against a pretty hefty HE, less the continuous shuffling effect.

If you add the two HEs together, you're playing a game with a combined HE of c6. Compare this to three card poker where the combined HE is around c5. Perhaps you ought to consider applying your progression at the 3CP table? I never make the bet myself, although it's fascinating how often people do seem to get paid on the and odds whenever I play for a couple of hours or so.

Good luck. Thank you for your reply Newb But according to my own first hand experience, it doesn't seem to be that high. Within hands range with progression betting, it is very likely you catch at least one PP plus other pairs along the way to make you a possible winner.

PP do appear often here in Queensland casinos and the payout is 30 to 1 I believe this is the highest available. But like I said, use the progression betting once at a time to control the risk. My goal is to win more times than lose in the long run, not to win every time. I will be interested to see computer simulation on this betting strategy and also test my One Box theory Personally I don't think card counting works for PP.

Either the count is high or low, it does not determine your cards will likely come out a pair, does it? There are simply too many possibilities, and compared to the very strict and accurate match of FIRST two cards, high-low card counting is way too rough and even irrelevant.

Also, I do not agree with your theory of "increased edge in the main bet to offset the edge in the side bet". They are two totally separate things. You bet on PP not because the edge in the main bet is high, but PP itself is worth playing if it is not, you never play it, unless you just want to try your luck.

A totally independent bet. Anyway, I am only concerned about CSMs as I think PP is worth playing only with CSMs, not shoe games. I've said the reason in my main post more cards removed from the shoe, more HE. The bets are indeed totally independent, but I was suggesting using the advantageous edge bet of one to offset the bet of the other returns wise.

If you were applying, say, a betting ramp, at a very high count you'd be betting 12 units rather than just 1 unit as it is prudent to do when playing a CSM flat betting. You could even bet max minus one and one unit on the PP when the count hit the threshold whatever it might be so the amount bet remained at 12 - but this would reduce the EV a tad.

Perhaps the answer would be to develop a revised count, or have a team of players keeping the count on specifc card types. jacks, queens etc. On a signal every player at the table could put out bets on the perfect pairs in addition to the usual betting ramp from counting.

With the high house edge on the side bet, and a neg EV on the main game, I think your losses will eventually outstrip your winnings - the maths suggest so, even though at present you may be up on the deal.

I've got my edge figures from the Wizard of Odds web site, and Mr Shackleton's calculations are noted to be pretty sound.

If your results are different, it's probably solely down to variance and a relatively small statistically speaking sample size.

My goal is to win more times than lose in the long run, not to win every time. I will be interested to see computer simulation on this betting strategy and also test my One Box theory Personally I don't think card counting works for PP.

Either the count is high or low, it does not determine your cards will likely come out a pair, does it? There are simply too many possibilities, and compared to the very strict and accurate match of FIRST two cards, high-low card counting is way too rough and even irrelevant.

Also, I do not agree with your theory of "increased edge in the main bet to offset the edge in the side bet". They are two totally separate things. You bet on PP not because the edge in the main bet is high, but PP itself is worth playing if it is not, you never play it, unless you just want to try your luck.

A totally independent bet. Anyway, I am only concerned about CSMs as I think PP is worth playing only with CSMs, not shoe games. I've said the reason in my main post more cards removed from the shoe, more HE.

The bets are indeed totally independent, but I was suggesting using the advantageous edge bet of one to offset the bet of the other returns wise.

If you were applying, say, a betting ramp, at a very high count you'd be betting 12 units rather than just 1 unit as it is prudent to do when playing a CSM flat betting.

You could even bet max minus one and one unit on the PP when the count hit the threshold whatever it might be so the amount bet remained at 12 - but this would reduce the EV a tad. Perhaps the answer would be to develop a revised count, or have a team of players keeping the count on specifc card types.

jacks, queens etc. On a signal every player at the table could put out bets on the perfect pairs in addition to the usual betting ramp from counting.

With the high house edge on the side bet, and a neg EV on the main game, I think your losses will eventually outstrip your winnings - the maths suggest so, even though at present you may be up on the deal. I've got my edge figures from the Wizard of Odds web site, and Mr Shackleton's calculations are noted to be pretty sound.

If your results are different, it's probably solely down to variance and a relatively small statistically speaking sample size. garygo Active Member Oct 11, newb99 said:. So the win rate on the higher count, with the higher bet, would go some way to covering the costs of the high edge on the side bet.

UK Well-Known Member Oct 11, garygo said:. why should we sacrifice our hard-earned chips with card-counting just to try the luck on PP? I doubt that card counting will ever work for PP bet. How are we going to ensure cards will come out as pairs which precisely arrive at your box and they will be exactly the first two cards dealt to you?

How are we going to decide the accurate ORDER they will be dealt to you as pairs, let alone Perfect Pairs? daddybo Well-Known Member Oct 11, Retun Perfect pair I was quoting for 6 deck which is virtually the standard in the UK. Charles Wells Member Oct 14, PP at crown Hi there Thank you newb99 for such a detailed analysis of this side bet.

Having never played PP or ever gone near a CSM mahogany room at Crown doesnt have them I cannot claim to be an expert on PP with or without CSM. I have always viewed it as another form of roulette to be avoided.

I have however spent quite a few hours on the , table in the private room to the right of the mahog room where there are two tables. On big gambling nights eg Derby day after midnight you will see real money thrown around esp on bacc but I digress. I dont think he even got more than one coloured pair either.

My estimation was he invested more than K on this side bet alone and got about 10K back. I assessed him as an novice level counter who bet very aggressively when the TC was high. Its interesting that the casino staff do not give any heat in this private room even to players going from bets to 10, They dont bat an eyelid.

In summary - play PP if you are nuts. Well-Known Member Oct 14, You can do it! maybe I had the "Perfect Pair Epiphany" several months ago, talked about it privately to a select few. For every denomination eliminated from the deck 7s for example , the probability odds of getting a pair in another denomination increases.

If you removed all of the 7s, 8s, and 9s from a shoe, then the probability of being dealt a pair of 6s is higher. Now, to track this you need to be either keeping 13 different side counts, or not counting cards in the traditional way and just flat betting and running your side count.

El Periódico de Sotogrande 361 Dde, Juan Carlos Ruiz ¿Ljsto wanted to Blacijack the achievements attained over these ¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs? Premios en línea del día in Bpackjack del Guadiaro; the dynamism and activism to reject the anchoring ground opposite the San Roque coastline, Blackkack facilities Blavkjack fair enclosure of Guadiaro, the vesafío of the canteen at CEIP Barbésula de San Enrique, ¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs? surfacing of more than fifty streets, Pzirs? implementation of Plaza Collado Tirado, the improvement of Plaza de La Bomba in San Enrique and the lights on Avenida Mar del Sur in Torreguadiaro, among others. If you lose, you lose what you have won, or in the worst case, you lose your original budget limited to 30 hands play - no more than that. Además, de numerosos desechos y basuras con todo lo que ello provoca mal olor, animales, suciedad, riesgo de incendio, etc. Also notable in its approach, in. La villa cuenta con calefacción por suelo radiante, aire acondicionado incorporado, una nueva cocina ampliada, pisos de madera en toda la casa, un gran salón-comedor con chimenea y 4 dormitorios, todos con sus baños Perfevt suite.

By Kilkree

Related Post

4 thoughts on “¿Listo para el desafío de Blackjack Perfect Pairs?”

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *